Now lets jump back to the mudflood pictures. This is the location of the Fountain, market, church, and cemetery that has a lot of things out of place and don’t add up. In the picture to the left the box on legs is the fountain which was kept in place with supports added as the ground underneath was removed
In 1973 the site was excavated to make way for an underground railway station. Fake artifacts were planted on the scene to support the mainstream narrative such as a bust of the Pope and the Virgin Mary, other religious items included a funerary incense burner, along with a small mass grave this supports the cemetery side and for the market place a keystone was inserted with a prominent merchant family sigil etched in. The Louvre and Notre Dame have the same M.O., while I couldn’t find images of the keystone I was able to get the ones from N.D. and Louvre.
The underground railway station is the biggest underground terminal in the world… I doubt that claim very much but it is significant that the claim is made at all. The foundation is said to have tied directly into the original church foundation from a thousand years ago and a small mass grave proves this is the case. Several of the fake relics are on display in the station
The Cemetery of the Innocents is said to be both the site of the old market square and the location of the cemetery that overflowed of corpses that eventually became the Catacomb.
This is the Fountain of the Innocents, the dates all are all from 1847 to 1878 and each one is different in a subtle way. The spire on top takes a few different forms, the lions at the base and the base itself, the dome is textured in some, others have grass and trees. At the very least the dates are scrambled with some features appearing on one image and then not on the next and then reappearing later on.
This is rhe one that stands out from the rest. While every other picture differs only by slight deviations this one is way off in ways that arent explicable by conventional means. Aside from the spire the cap is ribbed and there is no triangular pediment above the opening, although in the others there are openings in the dome which has art work featured around the spot in this one. Even the openings dont match up in the slide show and this image has platforms which appear to hold statuary since missing. The biggest and most obvious difference is the large statues and single corner column instead of the double and the style and orientation of the lions isn’t even close. Needless to say, nothing about these express continuity and each one is taken from a credible gatekeeper source like the MET, Rijksmuseum, and Louvre.Church connected to the market place
Speaking of fake archeology artifacts inserted into excavation sites lets talk about the Louvre for a sec. The first set of images is dated 1863, there isn’t much of a narrative but the story goes when they were doing repairs in the Louvre they discovered the remains of the original fortress. The layer is known as the Medieval Louvre and part of the museum. The thing is, the discovery wasn’t supposedly made until recently while building the glass pyramid, nobody knew anything about the foundations till then yet the images are right here that in fact somebody knew something. The middle column has a ladder for scale, look how big this well is.
The second set of images is the tourist trap level of the museum. This is the thing, its eerily similar in nature to the incident I recently covered about the discovery in Mexico of giant snake statues under the culture and heritage museum, also stinks like the time the Vatican church ‘discovered’ a set of religious catacombs under the courtyard of their new Christian Archeology Center. Any time the gatekeepers announce they found exactly what they are looking for right under their feet theres a 100% chance they are lying. So that brings us up to the present and the Louvre. Im pretty sure the foundations really are located on a different level then the rest of the complex however the date is wrong and the artifacts are hoaxed. Where the line is drawn between whats authentic and what is fabricated is up for discussion.
The Medieval foundations were ‘discovered’ while excavating for the glass pyramid installed recently in the museum. Other shout outs to Ancient Egypt are the Sphinx room and the bas-relief room, not to mention the tons of fake artifacts… It is a museum mind you.
These are more examples of fake stone cutter marks, the ‘As above, So below’ theme of Templar Crosses and occult sigils. The one with the crescent moon and cross is found within the Notre Dame… People think its appropriate to find Luciferian marks on sacred hallowed ground.
Staying with that thread there is a bust of Satan on one of the columns within the Louvre Medieval Layer
There is a stone scale model of the old foundations, further blurring the line between whats real and whats fabricated
“French conspiracy theorists propagated the idea that the pyramid was specifically built with 666 panes of glass and was “dedicated to a power described as the Beast in the Book of Revelation”. Simple counting reveals that there are 603 panes of glass in the pyramid – talk about not doing your research! So much for that goofy theory.”
I love the way normie cover writers belittle any attempt to cast critical light on the narrative. 603 is ‘6’ three times, so its still 666.
Just like with all the other archeological sites this one has the same repeating artifacts planted as evidence… Look, anything that supports the timeline is a lie. Here we have the de Medici family coat of arms which features a particular type of knot thats a representative of the swaztika and the scythe, the reaper tool of Saturn aka Satan. The Medicis are a family of Banksters whose history has been intertwined with that script of Louvre, the namesake artifact provides the illusion of evidence but also is a status symbol for the bankster elite. This vein also connects to Venice, which is the Winged Lion, another Sphinx variation.
Also excavated was handfuls of gambling game pieces; domino’s dice, knuckle bones… The one thing looks like a dreidel, appropriate if Venetian banksters are inserting themselves
The other matching pattern would be religious artifacts, in this case some armour bearing the fleur-de-lis, another sigil that represents Lucifer, the State and the Church, all three types of supreme authority.
This image caught my attn bc the windows are sandbagged. The excuse will be this was to protect from damage during the revolution but this is not the first place I have seen similar action. The bags are only covering the lower portion of the lowest level windows, like say, as if you are expecting a mudflood but not exactly sure how high the ground level will change
Keeping qith the Medici family, they have a fountain named in their honor in Paris, simply, the Medici Fountain. Its really creepy looking. Here is something I found earlier of sandbagging for protection more longer term.
Medici Fountain, dated 1853
Haussmann Architecture
Haussmann is the guy invented to confuse the layout plan of the streets of Paris. There are more old maps than you can shake a stick at. The streets went from narrow one-laners to the uber-wide boulavards we see today that I protest are the canal of Olde. The water ran under the buildings, which were raised on stilts.
Massive stone superstructure built on stilts at the Concorde Place. Site also hosted a staged photo op of an urban barricade during the revolution. The place is a photo set and the people are in costume… Did you ever notice a group of actors is called a ‘Troop”?
The place borders one of the longest buildings in Paris, notice all of the structures are on vaulted arcade foundations, nearly all of these have been converted into usable space but some areas still have open bottoms, essentially they are built on stilts, as one would expect if there was higher water elevation. This was a water-based culture, the waters have receded but the evidence is still there.
The facade of the Haussmann style is built in stone. The building consists as follows:
High ceiling ground floor that can accommodate shops with a first floor – called “mezzanine” – for storage or housing. These two stages are often horizontally striped.
“Noble” second floor, with balconies and richer windows frames. Why is the second stage the “noble” one ? Because at that time the civil lift does not exist yet. It therefore avoids the rich people the exhausting task of climbing stairs …
Third and fourth floors more conventional, with poorer windows frames. Individual balconies have appeared at the end of the Haussmann period following new regulations.
Fifth floor with running balcony. A floor that is not “noble”, but has a balcony for the sake of balance in the aesthetics of the façade.
Last floor for attic rooms.
Another building with the lower portion covered for long term, not like just steel bars to keep out tresspassers. E: A building on stilts
Two good examples of how a structure could be built on piers, the Hotel de Ville and Chateau Chenonceaux
Here’s one of the Notre Dame labeled 1847, the dates are all wrong but my favorite things about this image are the bell is still being used in the tower and the arched foundation is still visable. These two features are among the oldest and first removed fingerprints from the Olde World. Bells are significant bc they represent a form of instant communication. The arches are the tops of the legs which support the whole city, at the time a series of canals
Old World Wide Architecture
The model of the old castle Louvre is remarkably similar to the Rajistan citadel in India
